About Me

Name: King Vinyl
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

Hillary as Veep for McCain!!!

Hillary as VP??? is McCain a Serious???

Here it is my prediction Hillary Clinton will VP the GOP ticket because McCain can't get out the base and some of the republican faithful will vote for McCain no matter what happens.  When a person runs for president they really have to think what an effective stategy to victory is.  The only such path for John Huesein McCain is to annoint the Hildabeast as his running mate.  Heck he is already doing everything he can to keep her in this race.  He stated that she would make a fine president why not just tap her as VP and let us know how you really feel?
 
It is really much more than that listen to the the talkers they jumped on his wagon one at a time after Romney dropped out.  Now they are getting in bed with Mrs. Clinton one leg at a time.  They call us out on our partriotism to this country for shunning McCain.  So would it really matter if he is going to bring moderates and liberals into the party, why not Clintons?  Is there really a point at which enough is enough?  I don't think so because to Rush Limbaugh and his gaggle of 14 talk show morons it is all about radio.  It has nothing to do with love of country this entertainment crap they shovel like so much manure is is just that feces.  I am sorry to be so blunt but the only man who has said publically he would vote for McCain that sounds legitamite in his remarks is Newt Gingrich.  But maybe the only way to get him off his butt to run is if McCain would dare challenge the will of the GOP.  It is the only way he stands a chance VP Hillary John she is your soul mate.
 
Update:  5/28/08
 
Since talk is a buzz with the idea that Obama needs a conservative balance and McCain would have to win if he could out liberal Obama.  I feel that my point on this subject deserves futher examination.  It really appears that conservative talk has given McCain a blank check to liberalism.  No matter what they say to smack him on the wrists for it in November of this year they will be carrying double duty in the water line for the McGOP.   Today Limbaugh even suggested supporting Obama if he were nothing more than the authentic liberal.  But seeing is believing Rush,  in November you will find your place in line where your spot has been reserved like all the other sheeple of the McGOP.  The fact is McGOP former conservative party "leaders" have this pants down approach to this election cycle.  They know that the party has been on life support since 2005.  Their fall back "lessor of two evils" position has been negated by the conservative wolves in the Democrat party.  Now like the car salesman at a "lemon lot" they wait for the competition to break down and fortune to shine on their brand of product.   They discuss only the other parties agenda of topics costing their base to crumble.  They force the resignation of any person elected to office who falls short of their expectations.  Yet we are not to expect anything from them.  When this race is over and the "misery" index is reistated they trully believe they will regain the public trust.  This is a betrayal I will personally never forget, to waste political stock in protest of their own stupidity.  I will never support nor vote for another candidate of this party who throws their unconditional support behind McCain.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary as Veep for McCain!!!

Hillary as VP??? is McCain a Serious???

Here it is my prediction Hillary Clinton will VP the GOP ticket because McCain can't get out the base and some of the republican faithful will vote for McCain no matter what happens.  When a person runs for president they really have to think what an effective stategy to victory is.  The only such path for John Huesein McCain is to annoint the Hildabeast as his running mate.  Heck he is already doing everything he can to keep her in this race.  He stated that she would make a fine president why not just tap her as VP and let us know how you really feel?
 
It is really much more than that listen to the the talkers they jumped on his wagon one at a time after Romney dropped out.  Now they are getting in bed with Mrs. Clinton one leg at a time.  They call us out on our partriotism to this country for shunning McCain.  So would it really matter if he is going to bring moderates and liberals into the party, why not Clintons?  Is there really a point at which enough is enough?  I don't think so because to Rush Limbaugh and his gaggle of 14 talk show morons it is all about radio.  It has nothing to do with love of country this entertainment crap they shovel like so much manure is is just that feces.  I am sorry to be so blunt but the only man who has said publically he would vote for McCain that sounds legitamite in his remarks is Newt Gingrich.  But maybe the only way to get him off his butt to run is if McCain would dare challenge the will of the GOP.  It is the only way he stands a chance VP Hillary John she is your soul mate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reagan as I saw it

To Whom It May Concern:
 
Reagan was a man who saw alot potential in America.  Its seems to me he also saw the ill fate dealt by a failed Carter administration.  But that is not how Reagan got elected twice to office.  It wasn't soley on the basis of how he delivered his message but rather the content of it that grabbed public support.  However at the core of his message he seamed able to talk about the things that the majority of Americans agreeded on and really get his point across.  I think he figured if 75-80% of the population agreeded an issue like taxes, or the Cold War were problems it was because they wanted their leadership to fix them.  They might not all agree on exact details of getting there.  In the end the only thing that mattered was the results that is why he led.
 
Today we have three issues that most Americans want fixed.  But none of them are being addressed by any of the candidates.  Sure they all have their "opinions" on each of them but none has been consistant in it.  The three main things most Americans agree need to change are energy independence, illegal immagration, and government spending.
 
Instead of having huge discussions on any other issues a candidate who wants to be the next president would do much better in setting the agenda.  If all a candidate for our party talked about was why we need to drill for oil, how hokey the "global warming" thing is, and how unrealistc the UN-democrat plan is.  We could really get somewhere by telling the public any chance we got that liberal want $5/gallon gas because they want to force us all to buy new cars.  These are the same chumps who don't want voter ID because some poor person can't afford an ID card.  How do you cash a welfare check without an ID card?   The further we go down this path the higher the prices of everything gets with no end in sight.  This is the single biggest gamble this country has ever taken and our "leadership" acts as if it is a fore gone conclusion.  What if we get really severe weather one year and can't grow a corn crop like we can today?  Has anyone thought about pointing out that this idea of "weaning" ourselves off of oil is full of hole?  That Algore is trying to reinvent the wheel, he is playing us like a carnival fortune teller. 
 
Then there are the "jobs Americans don't want to do".  Anyone who says this is NOT a true conservative that includes Bush.  Who would want to bust their butt for $10-15/hr on some dead end job?  I don't understand how certain jobs that consist of skilled and unskilled labor have a set rate of pay in the minds of some and things like energy, medicine and law get traded openly on the free market.  The free market would determine that if there are not enough construction workers that the construction companies might have to pay a higher wage to get the job done.  Americans are smart they will go where the money is when it was in IT they went in droves.  The idea that some markets deserve an expemption from the free market and the laws of this country violates our constitution.  Enforcing the laws and repatriating  illegal aliens will have a huge positive impact on the middle class.  Some companies will have to raise their prices to increase payroll.  People will do any job in this country if we can make a decent living at it. $15/hr =30k/year that is $600/week before taxes.  Substract 20% that is $480 that is less than $2000 a month most house payment top $1000/ month.  Any rental agency will tell you that the minimum income per month to rent a home is three times the amount of the rent.  That would mean a person who wished to rent a home for their family would have to make $20/hr=40k/year that is $1000/week before taxes.  Subtract 20% that is $800 that is $3200/month.  To me that means these "guest workers" would be slaves of another color.
 
Government spending needs to be transparent to the people.  That is why the ear mark thing is so popular.  There is no debate their is no representation of the peoples' interests.  Call is whatever you want the fact is our founding fathers called a "tea party" over similar measures the british government used to take their money.  Their is no tax code that will fix this we need to have federal ballot iniatives to address these type issues.  That way laws can be written and voted on by the people to who the congress liable for stealing our money.  Allowing these people a soap box for their promises is like a bad intervention of a serious drug addict.  If nothing else we need a president who will veto any legislation with ear marked spending requirements.  Then to back it up appoint special prosecutors to investigate the members who put in for ear marks on legislation to see if their is any kick back or campaign donations associated with the spending.
 
Unfortunatly there are not ANY real leaders in the ranks of our party. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who the HELL would want to be a GOP politician!!!

  In  06' right after we lost the House majority I wa listening to Hugh Hewitt interviewing Tom Tancrado.  The first thing he told Tom is their is no way you are going to be president.  He went on to blaming Tom for the power shift in the House because of his stance on immgration.  Tom Tancredo is one of the most conservative memebers of the House of and the authority on immagration reform.  This was the last time I listened to Hewitt.
 
Then we can talk about Hannity yesterday who said this congressman no one has heard of from New York should resign.  Why is it that GOP politicians have to resin their seats that the people of their respected states voted them to when UN-Democrat members do not? 
 
You want to change something?  Try a moretoreum on resignations for personal difficulties and annouce it to the press.  If Jefferson (LA) can be caught red handed, have his office raided by the FBI and the result is we loose Hasterts' seat mabye that says something.  Hastert tried to sheild Jefferson like the rest of the Un-Democrats.  Jefferson still sits on Way & Means and the UN-Democrats have only increased their presence since.
 
It seems that no matter what the accusation is our so-called new media will contribute to the conversation and rally the troops to make the next imperfect member of whatever body of goverment walk the political plank.  That especially goes for cabinet members like Rumsfeld, Gonzales, and Rove.  But Clinton had Reno, Albright, and Berger and these people didn't get run out of office.  The double standard is a self inflicted Foley scandel waiting to happen.  If Dennis Hastert had gone to the microphone and told the press that the Mark Foley "page scandle" was distracting from the issues and that we should just "move on" it would have died in two days time.  If Bush would have told the press "war is hell" we can't runaway from combat with our enemies you are distracting from the real issues at hand so we need to "move on" Rumsfeld may have been able to adjust his tactics and we might even at this point be scaling back our efforts in victory.  Instead we allowed the issue to be discussed at length and everbody panicked, more troops were lost, and time, the UN-Democrats emboldened our enemy to fight back and it took two years to get it back on track.
 
Wake up people there is RED MEAT in the water you don't have to eat your own!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McGOP value smeal SUPERSIZED!!!(HEWITT)

Well, well, well  Hughbert Hewitt how do you like me now?  You have got to be the worlds biggest geek boy platitudinal reject NUTTER I have never known thank God.  The band wagon is a pin cusion for your rank ignorance.  First thing this cycle you blamed Tom Tancredo for causing the GOP lose in 06'.  You said it was because his stance on immagration that we lost the majority I heard you word for word in an on air interview with him.  Then you tagged Mitt as the LDS candidate for president.  Anyone who said the word mormon was called a bigot.  But you really did it to hide his LIBERAL record behind a smooth talking "flip FLOPPER" as you would put it.  Then you told the world that Mike Huckabee is way more liberal than McCain.  You did this after running around like a thoroughbred donkey telling everyone he couldn't win before Super Tuesdays Primary.  Then you said a vote for Huck is a vote for McCain, even though your candidate endorsed McCain.  Now you want the GOP to pull the lever for this two timing wanna be senator who gives self respecting RINOs a bad name.  This clown McCain makes Algore look like Lincoln but he wears the brand you like so you think we wil put him in.  It is all about the lessor of evils with simple sheeple such as yourself.  I tell you what I fully expect Hillary to mount a comeback and take the nomination from Obama and if she does I will vote for her.  You know why because I will not sit it out and I will not for vote for a traitor like McCain.  This mans military service is not the question here it is his senate record and what he has said and done in this campaign.  Most of all I want to see clowns like you off the air I find your attempt at humour offensive.  I think you try to play matchmaker for the ideals and principals between party and poll.  This sick mess is largely the fault of Talk-Radio who won't even dare consider the notion that by backing Romney the way they did that YOU are to blame.  I used to listen to your show everyday on KNUS in Denver but when you began to resort to your nerd goodie goodie name calling instead of fact check jounalism to dispel  your callers I got a bad taste in my mouth.  Not because I agreed with the caller but because you labeled people instead of winning the arguement.  Sometimes your caller had a really good point but in your haste to circle the wagons you took another hit of the crack pipe and started you Revenge of Chris Rock Nerds Show.  I don't care if you worked for Reagan a lot of half baked conservatives including Bush41 worked for Reagan.  McCain was a POW and a war hero that doesn't validdate his "global warming" speech.
 
 
So thanks for the 99 cent McGOP value menu  why don't you go back to finger painting the map RED!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Phoenix of Conservatism 08'

For a Phoenix to rise from the ash it must first burn.  In the GOP there has been a long standing struggle for the party mantle.  My father told me what that meant in the era of Barry Goldwater.  I saw it for myself in through the leadership of Reagan.  Now we are at a crossroads of ill proportion.  Most of us voted for Goerge W. Bush even though we saw his platform as too far left.  Those same voters put him over the top in the primary beating John McCain.  Now I don't care what kind of rain dance the talkers do from now until November we Conservatives will not cross over to the Republican Party.  It is one thing to vote for a man of principal with some disagreable points of view.  It is however entirely a different matter to vote for one who makes a living throwing Conservatives under the bus of Socialism for his own political gains.  He is not alone in this others have seen and have followed his ways.  Look no further than the seat Dennis Hastert held in Illinois.  Then step back to Reagans' lanslide re-election campaign of 84'.  Hastert ran to the aide of William Jefferson as justice stood perced on his doorstep.  He proved to the American people that the United States Congress is unaccountable to justice as it applies to the adverage citizen of this country.  Reagan was not just a great communicator he was a leader whose vision was one he shared with enthusiasm.  He taught a generation that good morals, sound judgements, and a higher calling exist is every American.  He inspired the entire world to greatness.   So now he is gone and every so called Conservative wants his postumous blessing as a visionary of Conservative thought.  The problem with that lies in the ability to champion the core issues that UNTIE this nation.  Reagan fought the Cold War head on, no regrets. NO FEAR!!!  He faced feirce opposition even with in his own ranks.  He didn't answer the opposition with CONSENSUS!!!  He fought the fire with GASOLINE!!!  Instead of crossing the isle to garner support he took a mandate of the people.  He look America dead in the face and told us how it would be and what he could do to change it.  This cycle the talkers tried desperatly to prop Mitt Romney up as being this sort of man.  What a joke,  the man has never done a single Conservative thing in his life as a politician yet they claim him as a true Conservative.  They labeled him the LDS candidate in much the same manner the DNC has tagged Obama as the Black candidate.  Questions about eithers core beliefs and past principals is met with a charge of bigotry.
 
So what does it take for a rise from the ash of past foleys in the GOP?  Last time it took a "Contract With America" the time before it took Jimmy Carter.  This time it may just take Barrack Huesein Obama. 
 
The answer to all this is so simple.  We have a convention in this party for a reason.  The only way to take control of this calamity that is the product of a liberal infection in our party is this.  Throw McCain right under the Straight EIBS Express.  Then nominate a candidate who can unite not just the GOP voters but the entire nation. 
 
1)  Amercians overwhelmingly agree that we need to stop illegal immagration NOW!!!
 
2)  We also know that we would have a better economy if we had back the manufacturing jobs we have shipped over seas.
 
3)  Although Democrat leaders think we need to spend $5/gallon for gas most Americans would like to see us paying around $1/gallon.
 
4)  Last but not least love our country and we are sick and tired of the back stabbing BS we hear from Washington about something these clowns never intend to solve.
 
If we put a man at the head of our party who talked only about those issues the way liberals go on and on and on we would crush them in November.  While they carp about healthcare, we can link that to job loss.  When they talk about breaking up families by deporting illegals we can talk about families of American citizen who suffer because their wages have been cut, their crimes rate that sky rocket, and overstretched communtiy infrastructure.  They are the party of gay marriage, the ones who want to teach elementary children about drugs and sex.  Global warming is only on the map because we let them frame the debate.  Instead of getting out in front of the issue we have has been politicians like Gingrich trying liken us to it.  We need leadership not a sinking ship for the sake of a ship.
 
We need to tell Limbaugh, Hannity, Ingraham, Prager, Savage, Hewitt, Medved, Gallager, Coulter, and all the rest that while we agree with much of what they say they need to actually LEAD, FOLLOW OR GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY!!!
 
This back seat driving waterboy crap is not the sign of leadership or party loyalty is is a sham of the highest order to believe that any of these people care about the daily dealings of this party when they are too afraid to run for office is a crock. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is Talk Radio dropping the ball on purpose???

All Democrat Primary coverage all the time is what you will hear on the AM dial.  What was once a great forum for information and truth in facts reporting.  Now it has become an echo chamber so a sudo conservative agenda.  Why would all this be happening you might ask???  One thing over the last year is clear.  Every single "conservative" talk host was in the tank for Romney from the moment he announced his intention to run for president.  Most tried to focus on the issues but as the primary season drew to an end it became more apparent they would not so easily be denied.  That is why they came out at once attacking Huckabee as worse than McCain.  I wish someone would conduct a poll on that.  Because anyone who believes that is either ignorant or has an agenda.  I believe talk was the latter.  Knowing McCain could never win they papered over Romneys liberalism in an attempt to paint all the opposition to his candidacy as religious bigotry.  If they applied the same standard to Romney as they have to Obama on religion we could have seen that issue put to rest.  Both men have serious issues with hate in their religions Romneys is from the founder of his religion.  Ignoring the facts of his time as govenor is also an issue.  Last cycle all we heard was about Kerry being a "flip flopper" and an elitest from Massachusets.  Now they think we will vote for say one thing DONE another Mr. Romney.  My point here is by looking at the title of Hewitts' book and the behavior of the gaggle of talkers in the tank for Mitt one thing is crystal clear.  They wanted to make LDS the issue to distract from his record of pro-choice, pro-gay, tax & spend economics.  Now Rush is carping OPERATION KAOS to distract the GOP voters from their absolute hatred of John McCain.  They have been trying to frame their support as contingent on his choice of running mate and trying to nail him down on conservative issues.  First off it doesn't matter who he picks because it would take a Joe Arpiao to balance the ticket.  He is more likely to pick a weaker person who will not over shadow him.  He wants a puppet in this role not a leader.  Second McCain will do what he wants when he wants when it is good for John.  He is not a trustworthy man we can vote for he wil further weaken and divide our party.  But is that what the talkers want???  They have already started Mitts' 12' campaign  I think stuck on stupid apllies to this as well as any other explaination.  This isn't about conservatism anymore I don't care whos' mantel they claim to carry.  Ronald Reagan is not with us and he is turning in his grave.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A nail biting BLOWOUT!!! GOP needs to reshuffle the deck!!!

Who cares about the golfer or Operation KAOS!!! OOOOH we ain't voting for John Amnesty McCain no matter WHO he cons into accepting (political suicide) the VP spot on his lame ticket.
 
To be honest Rush I listen almost everyday.  But you are not right 98.8% on the time.  Your ignorant idea that the democrats picked McCain is a narrow and out of touch point.   Levin, Hewitt and Hannity can call all the name they want but you guys threw out the only candidate who could win for a Paper Tiger Conservative (Romney).  I wasn't a huge Huckabee guy nor was I big on Bush but Romney has never ever done one conservative thing in office.  Coulter says McCain is more conservative than Huckabee.  Really, then how?  At least Huckabee is trustworthy and does what he says.  Which is the one and only true quality of Bush he will fall on his own sword before going back on his word for good or bad.  But not talk radio, they serve their own interests.  If Limbaugh gave a crap about this country with all his superior knowledge running wouldn't even be a question but a matter of timing.  He likes the back seat but he ain't quite at the wheel.  McCain isn't a conservative he is the king RINO.  This is his last campaign and IF, and I mean IF he wins which he won't he will break the GOP platform into a million silly little pieces.
 
I really don't care who he picks he needs to loose and I mean not a second but a third place finish so that he resigns his senate seat out of shear embarasment.  We need a reality check on our party.  Rush always talks about being the party of ideas, well this is a bad one.  We know the worst case senario in this and it starts with McCain selling us all out as bigots, folls, and liars.  His 08' run cold at that rate cost us 40 years of minority status.
 
McCain is a wolf his loyalty is his ego and none other.  If no one steps up as a legitamite third party we must vote for a GOP control in the senate and the house.  The focus on the races we can win is the KEY!!!  The whitehouse is lost unless we have another candidate.  If we really want an operation KAOS we can vote Nader over the 15% margin of matching funds and let the DNC fall flat on their face in the whitehouse.
 
Nafer 08" OPERATION KAOS!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (1) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

$0.18/gallon ain't no small POTATO!!! (MUST READ)

This is the problem with the talking heads and the mainstream monkey grinders.  They read this stuff off of a script instead of exploring how the small things effect the big picture.
 
Here in Missouri our congress is debating a halt to the state gasoline tax.  They are also looking at removing the recently passed state legislation mandating 10% ethanol added to all gas.  This idea is spreading like wildfire it all starts with the first move.  Then there is the real idea that US citizens are mad as hell about the gas prices and the longer it stays front and center in the media the more exposure the issue gets.  I have been blogging for almost a year about the 99'-00' campaign season and for even longer been writing letters to Rush, Sean and Laura about this.  The DEMOCRATS came up with "GLOBAL WARMING"  and laid the blame on America.  They said the only way to stop us from driving those evil SUVs' was to raise gas prices to $4-$5/gallon because it was a fair price and Europeans paid it so we should to.  But it takes $3.50 a gallon to get the talkradio to see the light on this.
 
What is $0.18 a gallon?  Well how about lower cost of food for starters.  You have to be a complete moron not to be able to follow the trial everything you consume itself consumes FUEL.  Your power, food, the repairman, school buses and it goes on and on and on.  So Warren Buffet, and Hussein Obama are the socialist trying to justify road construction on roads they want used less so what the heck are we building them for?  Then we have Bloomberg the NY mayor saying it defeats the whole purpose of high prices it is supposed to convince us to drive less.
 
Let just tell you this I have a company of my own I wanted to hire an employee but this economical game of chicken keeps me working longer hours afraid there might not be a next job.  My company is a home repair company I currently charge $30/per hour I had to raise my rate from $25 because of higher material and gasoline prices.  If fuel hits $4 a gallon I will be at $35 and if it goes to $5 I will raise my price to $50.  I don't care if I can't get a job at that rate I will close my business before I starve.  How in the heck do these same clowns expect me to pay income taxes when I can't clear $30,000 a year.
 
Besides the Illegal Immagration Issue is bad enough.  I may just quit filing and ask for a Z-visa.  Come get me I say I can't wait to tell some black robed POS how I feel about his "JUSTICE SYSTEM".
 
We need an "UN-civil War" of 2nd Amendment proportions!!!
 
STOP WASTING OUR MONEY!!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ronald Reagan GOP Vs Man Vannity Say Anything

The other day my dad told me that in the 60s' a Barry Goldwater campaign that said we needed to bomb the hell out of Vietnam to win the war lost.  America voted for a Democrat Administration which turned out to be the watered down version of Golwaters' plan.  We still bombed the hell out of them even though the Democrats said we wouldn't but the difference was we lost the war.
Reagan God rest his soul was a scholar of conservatism he knew the importance of being infront of the issues and the press.  He NEVER coward at anything or to anyone.  He was the greatest president the 20th Century unlike Rosevelt his decisions preserved the fabric of Americana.  His virtues gave unto the next generation a better life despite the shortsighted nature of the liberals who came before him.  His word can unlike his liberal counter parts never be erased because he didn't just include God he presided over his people in his favor.

Now we have a new breed of conservatism which is led primarily by a talk show host named Rush Limbaugh.  Rush is a great man however he is insecure in his true abilities to lead.  His intelect in conservatism is of the Reagan. Goldwater mark yet he shirks his true callings to those who need his wisdom.  Instead of being their critic as a true profeesor would he accepts them as his equals.  These include other talk show types and even our President George W Bush.  Rush is far and away a more outspoken conservative than any of them but for reason I can only speculate allows them to exist under his umbrella of acceptance.  Therefore Mr Limbaugh represents sudo conservativism until such time as he defines himself away from those who stray from the path.
 
Sean Hannity is a good man but he is a sellout conservative.  He thinks a conservative should be perfect anything less is totally expendable.  His lack of true conservatism is the cancer in th GOP.  Reagan would have loved his courage of conviction but felt betrayed by his foolish inability to draw a clear conservative destinction between real conservatism and the weakness of bipartisnship.  I site this as an example.  Today he interview former Massachusets Govenor Mitt Romney.  He spoke with Mitt about Jeremiah Wright and his religion.  What he failed to recognize is the parallel between the Obama and Romney.  While condeming Obama for his associations with a hate monger like Wright he unveiled the failings of Romney.  Obama can not be believed when he condems the racism and hatred he accepted as a memeber of Wrights church.  However Romney must ultimatly condem Joseph Smiths' racism nad hatreds if he ever expects to succesfully run for higher office.  The hipocracy is that both Smith and Wright are the same men on other ends of the spectrum.  Hannitys' ignorance as to the true beliefs of LDS and why those beliefs were modified are at the core of what he calls the bigotry toward the LDS religion.  In his defense the rest of talk radio follows suit in this belief that Smith is not a factor in present day perception of the LDS religion.  They are wrong, those of us who have studied the LDS faith know Mormons view Smith as a god.  Like Wright he is seen as a prophet and their religios beliefs are structured around his principles.  Romney had a chance to force the LDS faithful to publically denounce the racisms in the founding of LDS but he accepted the pass.  This hipocracy has given us John McCain.   
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »