About Me

Name: King Vinyl
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

Which speeches America wants to watch \\STUNNING update///!!!

August 29th 6pm (CST)
When you figure last night was the biggest night of the DNC convention and all the hype surrounding Obama's "BIG" speech. There are some very interesting numbers if you look at how many times the individual speakers videos have been viewed on You Tube. For instance Michelle Obama spoke the first night and video of her speech has been viewed 129,461 that is 32,365 on average each day since. Dennis Kucinich spoke on the 26th according to You tube, who else knew? Well 102,314 people who watched it on their website, that’s who. The Kucinich speech has been viewed on an average of 34,104 times a day since he spoke. Both however are clearly dwarfed by none other then Bill Clinton whose speech was viewed an average of 52,060 times each day a current total of 104,121. Hillary did make the list behind at 70,222 but only 23,407 times a day. When considering Al Gore whose speech last night drew 24,407 views so far it makes you wonder if she would have fared any better than he did.

Oh I'm sorry I wasn't trying to forget the ticket Obama/Biden 08' they also are on the list and these numbers prove what I have said all along. The end for the Democrats is at hand, the days of outspoken radicalism in US politics is over. Barrack Obama spoke last night and so far his speech has been viewed 38,675 times, he is the one running not Bill Clinton whose speech two nights ago has been viewed almost three times more than Obama. Then Joe Biden's speech the same night as Bill Clinton was viewed 55,472 times that would be 27,736 times a day since he spoke. That is less traffic than either Kucinich or Michelle Obama both within a few thousand votes of the big "O".

Others spoke but they are hardly note worthy, I mean Pelosi spoke three days ago only 3,295 people cared enough to watch it on You Tube. Since Obama announced Biden as his VP six days ago 8,448 views and when Biden spoke to accept he got 6,839 views.

Some would say Michelle was the key note that is why she went up so high. Maybe so, but I didn't even know Kucinich was there and on the averages he is third behind Clinton and Obama. Then what about the hype for Obama his live audience was twice what the others saw why is he back in the pack.

Just words, Just speeches, just and observation of both
 
 
Update August 29th 10pm (CST):
 John McCains announced Palin and so far has 41,766 views since noon at 3:30 it only had 215 views.  In fairness Obama has now moved up to 72,825 as have all the other speakers but his has gone up more significantly.  We will keep you posted
 
 
 
Update 8/30/08 2:20 pm (CST):  Obama's speech Thursday is coming up on 48 hrs with over 111,148.  Bill Clinton is still leading his speech from the previous night at 130,910, however I think it note worthy to point out that 111,324 people viewed Dennis Kucinich's who spoke the same night as Hillary and she is up t 86,044.
 
Contrast that with McCAin's VP intro speech made 26 hrs ago at 107,869 he will eclipse Obama by 5pm(CST) in my estimation or sooner.  When all the media hype was centered around Hillary, and who Obama picked was just as big if not bigger in the eyes of the MSM.  The Obama introduction and the speech Biden gave in accepting are currently at 15,916. Oh and Nancy Pelosi sits at an ice-cold 3,683 thats only 388 since the last time I counted if she could call those book sales she might have something.
 
 
Update: August 30th 9:00pm (CST):
 
This just in John McCain now 30 hrs after his VP speech now has 123,920 views on YouTube.  Yet Obama who the media have hype to the hilt has managed to achieve 119,177 views almost exactly 72 hours after his convention acceptance speech, his VP annoucement has only gotten 16,058.  So the between the last time I logged in an entry on this to now McCain had an additional 16,051 hits while Obama had only 8,029, and Pelosi had a staggering 94 (if it was only books sales).  Kucinich meanwhile added 1690 to his total and Bill is still moving at 134,179, but is getting slowly caught by Obama who should overtake him in hit totals by late Monday if the trend holds.
 
Update: August 31st  McCain's VP totals are now up to 135,452 hits,  Obama's acceptence speech is at 129,054 a difference of 6398.   The trend shows McCain pulling away by another 1655 hits increasing his lead.  Obama's VP announcment speech at 16,216 and Joe Biden's convention speech is at 66,650 hits.  On a much lighter note Nancy Pelosi still chugging along adding a whopping 75 hits.  Bill Clinton added 3,340 for a total of 137,519 which means by the next update McCain's VP selection speech should overtake him.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Which speeches America wants to watch \\STUNNING//!!!

When you figure last night was the biggest night of the DNC convention and all the hype surrounding Obama's "BIG" speech. There are some very interesting numbers if you look at how many times the individual speakers videos have been viewed on You Tube. For instance Michelle Obama spoke the first night and video of her speech has been viewed 129,461 that is 32,365 on average each day since. Dennis Kucinich spoke on the 26th according to You tube, who else knew? Well 102,314 people who watched it on their website, that’s who. The Kucinich speech has been viewed on an average of 34,104 times a day since he spoke. Both however are clearly dwarfed by none other then Bill Clinton whose speech was viewed an average of 52,060 times each day a current total of 104,121. Hillary did make the list behind at 70,222 but only 23,407 times a day. When considering Al Gore whose speech last night drew 24,407 views so far it makes you wonder if she would have fared any better than he did.

Oh I'm sorry I wasn't trying to forget the ticket Obama/Biden 08' they also are on the list and these numbers prove what I have said all along. The end for the Democrats is at hand, the days of outspoken radicalism in US politics is over. Barrack Obama spoke last night and so far his speech has been viewed 38,675 times, he is the one running not Bill Clinton whose speech two nights ago has been viewed almost three times more than Obama. Then Joe Biden's speech the same night as Bill Clinton was viewed 55,472 times that would be 27,736 times a day since he spoke. That is less traffic than either Kucinich or Michelle Obama both within a few thousand votes of the big "O".

Others spoke but they are hardly note worthy, I mean Pelosi spoke three days ago only 3,295 people cared enough to watch it on You Tube. Since Obama announced Biden as his VP six days ago 8,448 views and when Biden spoke to accept he got 6,839 views.

Some would say Michelle was the key note that is why she went up so high. Maybe so, but I didn't even know Kucinich was there and on the averages he is third behind Clinton and Obama. Then what about the hype for Obama his live audience was twice what the others saw why is he back in the pack.

Just words, Just speeches, just and observation of both
 
 
Update: John McCains announced Palin and so far has 41,766 views since noon at 3:30 it only had 215 views.  In fairness Obama has now moved up to 72,825 as have all the other speakers but his has gone up more significantly.  We will keep you posted
 
 
 
Update 8/30/08 2:20 pm (CST):  Obama's speech Thursday is coming up on 48 hrs with over 111,148.  Bill Clinton is still leading his speech from the previous night at 130,910, however I think it note worthy to point out that 111,324 people viewed Dennis Kucinich's who spoke the same night as Hillary and she is up t 86,044.
 
Contrast that with McCAin's VP intro speech made 26 hrs ago at 107,869 he will eclipse Obama by 5pm(CST) in my estimation or sooner.  When all the media hype was centered around Hillary, and who Obama picked was just as big if not bigger in the eyes of the MSM.  The Obama introduction and the speech Biden gave in accepting are currently at 15,916. Oh and Nancy Pelosi sits at an ice-cold 3,683 thats only 388 since the last time I counted if she could call those book sale she might have something
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Last one to Hillary's a Rotten Egg

As the conventions close in there is but one question and  a constant in both parties.  Who is the VP and the first one to Hillary wins.
 
This is the first time I can remember when a VP selection meant this huge a block of voters, on either side.  Let alone in campaigns that are clearly the only voter in their base away from winning The Whithouse.  In theory both party extremes would sit out rather than switch sides, and both expect their candidate to pick a nominee who represents that part of the party platform.  However their is a pig in the wood pile, one who could change this race turn this contest on a dime. 
 
I submit to you that if either John Sydney McCain or Barrack Huesein Obama were to pick Hillary Rodham Clinton they would 99.99*% be our next Commander in Chief of these United States of America.  Republicans don't dare risk Obama now that he has been exposed for his general ignorance.  Democrats are all in and can't afford the coat tail effect of Republican voters going to the polls and almost certainly taking back the legislative branch of goverment, any lose would be catastrophic.  Hillary could not possibly win a GOP primary either so it's safe for the Republicans, in theory.  However any Republican could tell you that is like having Satan for supper.  Democrats have to lock in 16 years if Obama gets elected and the last 8 would most certainly involve the Clintons. 
 
The one way out I see for McCain is to ask a real African-American leader with executive experiance, former Lt.Govennor Micheal Steele (R) to accept the nod for VP.  In my opinion at this point Obama is out of options, which means he will pick Hillary out of neccessity.  If he does and McCain picks wrong it's over.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dime Store Jesus and the Moral Decay

Well here we are and may the best man win unless the other guy pulls the Jesus card.  We saw alot of this in the GOP primary and it served as nothing other than a wedge to separate otherwise Republicans from their conservative principles.  This idea that anyone really knows that what they believe is some how better, superior, or the one right way is a bunch of nonsense.  If there is only one way to God the rest of us that don't believe that exact dialogue are going to hell?  Mormons and Muslims who claim they are the only way when picking these religions apart can be done like taking good ribs off the bone.  Subtile hate is that really what they teach you as a Catholic or Jew?   To blather on about ones self like a Baptist, the Assembly, Seven Day whatever non denominational shopping mall faith you pretend to speak tongues in.  I can say alot about the hypocracies of any prodestant faith but it gets really old.
What I really have a hard time with is those who call into question every single action another person takes without accounting for the actions they take.  Mike Huckabee for instance, never had to acknowledge anything to do with Mitt Romney being a Mormon.  But he did, he let it be known his true feelings on the matter.  Everyone has those feelings it is just not appropriate in the course of a political discussion.  I have to think he was drawn in a bit by Hugh Hewitts latest NON-thriller, A Mormon in the White House.  It seemed that shortly after that book was released anything said against Mitt was an attack on his faith even when it wasn't.  Talk radio is to blame for GOP candidate McCain becoming our nominee for just that reason.  They picked up the silly mantra of Hewitt who laid the ground work for turning politics into a religious debate until all lost sight of the real issues at hand.  I admitt it I even got sucked into bashing Mitt on his LDS beliefs.  My true feelings can be seen on blogs I wrote all throughout the primaries.  Mitt was the LDS candidate for president and Mike was the Baptist candidate.  I am a Lutheran, I don't have any affection for tea-totaling but I have relation to a negative LDS backround.  The way in which the talk parots of the AM dial chose to cast their desperisons on Huckabee came right out of the DNC bible.  So I fought hard against Mitt, I can't say I would ever consider backing off that position either minus the LDS conponent.  His politics were a 180 from his message, just like Obama.  So when Obama gets into trouble being on the wrong side of an issue he pulls the race card, and for Mitt he pulls the anti-LDS card. 
 
When Bush debated Gore he pulled the Jesus card when asked what man he most admired.  This is the same card that gives Jackson, Wright, and Sharpton the title of Reverened.  Not one of those men is acting on the will of God when they are attempting to sell their relationship with him as a way of defining the character they claim to emulate.  These acts of faithlessness are cowardly and wrong.  God is not some card you hold up as a measure of your worth to the world.  If a person wants to speak for the will of the Lord let him do so in the context of his Word and teach it.
 
There is no real differance between a false prophet and one who uses God as a stage prop.  This is not limited to politicains I don't know how many times I have heard some crack pot theory about Harry Potter teaching kids about the occult.  Coming from persons who watch Oprah, CBS, and beleive in man made global warming.
 
Separation of church and state means we don't need a specificmember of any religion in any office.  Because we get lost in the ideals of eachothers faiths we have allowed the meaning to be twisted into a removal of faith when it should be a removal of religion.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama FINALLY admits it's a supply side issue!!!

The first time I heard it was on Fox News Sunday.  Tom Dashole said that his idea for an energy policy was for the president to release the strategic oil reserves.  He claimed that would provide Americans relief from rising gas prices.  What a joke.  Then today Obama made the same statement to his crowd of worshipers at a campaign event today.  But what does that really say?  Duh, it says that we need to put more oil into the market.
 
Why on earth is that idea a bunch of fluff then?  Because their claim that the futures market is what is reasponsible for the rising price is true.  So then anyone who knows about the reserves can tell you that releasing them will only reduce prices on a temporary basis by about 2-3 cents a gallon.  I would not at all be surprised if releasing those reserves did not cause a huge spike in crude oil prices.  Why, because it would be a huge indication to the market that we Americans are going to continue to starve the supply of oil on the market.  Does anyone remember the first time oil went above $100 barrel?  All it took was one man with a lot of money taking a million barrels off the market for one day.
 
The market reacts now to real conditions on the ground.  There is only one solution to gas prices, one solution for our economic woes.  Release the oil shale, release the outer continential shelf, release ANWR!!!  When the market figures out that we intend to control our future energy interest they will respond immediatly.  Not in five or ten years, not in twenty years, right now.  Then the price of oil will fall to levels closer to the cost of production rather than 10x production cost.
 
We still have to deal with the myth of a windfall profits tax.  Why not impose these taxes on industries we don't need?  It would be just as easy to charge this tax to the entertainment industry for any TV show or movie rated over PG or music containing explicit lirics.  We could use the money to pay for family services.  Then we could charge this tax to colleges who charge excessive tuition fees.  Then give the money to educate inner city kids who get stiffed by the govenment schools.   Taxing oil makes oil more expensive, listening to those who have always wanted energy prices at these rates is what got us here.  So listening to them on solving the problem is a kin to Stockholm Syndrome.
 
But at least Obama agrees we need to boost supply he is just not honest or intelligent enough to see what that really means.
 
We can't conserve our way out of this.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »