About Me

Name: King Vinyl
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

Last one to Hillary's a Rotten Egg

As the conventions close in there is but one question and  a constant in both parties.  Who is the VP and the first one to Hillary wins.
 
This is the first time I can remember when a VP selection meant this huge a block of voters, on either side.  Let alone in campaigns that are clearly the only voter in their base away from winning The Whithouse.  In theory both party extremes would sit out rather than switch sides, and both expect their candidate to pick a nominee who represents that part of the party platform.  However their is a pig in the wood pile, one who could change this race turn this contest on a dime. 
 
I submit to you that if either John Sydney McCain or Barrack Huesein Obama were to pick Hillary Rodham Clinton they would 99.99*% be our next Commander in Chief of these United States of America.  Republicans don't dare risk Obama now that he has been exposed for his general ignorance.  Democrats are all in and can't afford the coat tail effect of Republican voters going to the polls and almost certainly taking back the legislative branch of goverment, any lose would be catastrophic.  Hillary could not possibly win a GOP primary either so it's safe for the Republicans, in theory.  However any Republican could tell you that is like having Satan for supper.  Democrats have to lock in 16 years if Obama gets elected and the last 8 would most certainly involve the Clintons. 
 
The one way out I see for McCain is to ask a real African-American leader with executive experiance, former Lt.Govennor Micheal Steele (R) to accept the nod for VP.  In my opinion at this point Obama is out of options, which means he will pick Hillary out of neccessity.  If he does and McCain picks wrong it's over.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dime Store Jesus and the Moral Decay

Well here we are and may the best man win unless the other guy pulls the Jesus card.  We saw alot of this in the GOP primary and it served as nothing other than a wedge to separate otherwise Republicans from their conservative principles.  This idea that anyone really knows that what they believe is some how better, superior, or the one right way is a bunch of nonsense.  If there is only one way to God the rest of us that don't believe that exact dialogue are going to hell?  Mormons and Muslims who claim they are the only way when picking these religions apart can be done like taking good ribs off the bone.  Subtile hate is that really what they teach you as a Catholic or Jew?   To blather on about ones self like a Baptist, the Assembly, Seven Day whatever non denominational shopping mall faith you pretend to speak tongues in.  I can say alot about the hypocracies of any prodestant faith but it gets really old.
What I really have a hard time with is those who call into question every single action another person takes without accounting for the actions they take.  Mike Huckabee for instance, never had to acknowledge anything to do with Mitt Romney being a Mormon.  But he did, he let it be known his true feelings on the matter.  Everyone has those feelings it is just not appropriate in the course of a political discussion.  I have to think he was drawn in a bit by Hugh Hewitts latest NON-thriller, A Mormon in the White House.  It seemed that shortly after that book was released anything said against Mitt was an attack on his faith even when it wasn't.  Talk radio is to blame for GOP candidate McCain becoming our nominee for just that reason.  They picked up the silly mantra of Hewitt who laid the ground work for turning politics into a religious debate until all lost sight of the real issues at hand.  I admitt it I even got sucked into bashing Mitt on his LDS beliefs.  My true feelings can be seen on blogs I wrote all throughout the primaries.  Mitt was the LDS candidate for president and Mike was the Baptist candidate.  I am a Lutheran, I don't have any affection for tea-totaling but I have relation to a negative LDS backround.  The way in which the talk parots of the AM dial chose to cast their desperisons on Huckabee came right out of the DNC bible.  So I fought hard against Mitt, I can't say I would ever consider backing off that position either minus the LDS conponent.  His politics were a 180 from his message, just like Obama.  So when Obama gets into trouble being on the wrong side of an issue he pulls the race card, and for Mitt he pulls the anti-LDS card. 
 
When Bush debated Gore he pulled the Jesus card when asked what man he most admired.  This is the same card that gives Jackson, Wright, and Sharpton the title of Reverened.  Not one of those men is acting on the will of God when they are attempting to sell their relationship with him as a way of defining the character they claim to emulate.  These acts of faithlessness are cowardly and wrong.  God is not some card you hold up as a measure of your worth to the world.  If a person wants to speak for the will of the Lord let him do so in the context of his Word and teach it.
 
There is no real differance between a false prophet and one who uses God as a stage prop.  This is not limited to politicains I don't know how many times I have heard some crack pot theory about Harry Potter teaching kids about the occult.  Coming from persons who watch Oprah, CBS, and beleive in man made global warming.
 
Separation of church and state means we don't need a specificmember of any religion in any office.  Because we get lost in the ideals of eachothers faiths we have allowed the meaning to be twisted into a removal of faith when it should be a removal of religion.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »